19010: bootloaders/riotboot: add tinyUSB DFU support r=benpicco a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
This PR provides
- the tinyUSB DFU and DFU Runtime support and
- the `riotboot_tinyusb_dfu` bootloader that uses the tinyUSB DFU mode to flash new application images.
~This PR includes PR #18983 for now to be compilable.~
### Testing procedure
1. Use any board that supports the `riotboot´ and `tinyusb_device` features and flash the bootloader first, for example
```
BOARD=nucleo-f767zi make -C bootloaders/riotboot_tinyusb_dfu flash
```
and check that the `riotboot_tinyusb_dfu` bootloader is in DFU mode:
```
dfu-util --list
```
3. Flash a first application using the following command:
```
FEATURES_REQUIRED=riotboot USEMODULE=tinyusb_dfu BOARD=nucleo-f767zi \
make -C tests/saul PROGRAMMER=dfu-util riotboot/flash-slot0
```
and check that the application starts and is seen as upgradable:
```
dfu-util --list
```
4. Restart the node in bootloader DFU mode by:
```
dfu-util -e
```
Flash a second application, for example
```
FEATURES_REQUIRED=riotboot USEMODULE=tinyusb_dfu BOARD=nucleo-f767zi \
make -C tests/shell PROGRAMMER=dfu-util riotboot/flash-slot1
```
and check that the second application starts and is seen as upgradable:
```
dfu-util --list
```
### Issues/PRs references
~Depends on PR #18983~
19149: SECURITY: Describe that declassification is an option r=benpicco a=chrysn
### Contribution description
Our security policy does not contain provisions for the case when what is reported is not what we consider an actual security issue. As it is described now, everything reported through security@ would go through the full treatment, including a point release.
I'm not sure it belongs into the text itself (as it's more about how security reporters interact with the project than internals), but declassification should IMO be backed at least by 3 maintainers, and no strong NACK.
### Issues/PRs references
#19141 followed that procedure after some chat on it on the maintainers channel. (In the discussion, I proposed declassification, with 2.5 people supporting it and one "I was about to, but can we be sure nobody is using it?" voice).
Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
Co-authored-by: chrysn <chrysn@fsfe.org>
- most were trivial
- missing group close or open
- extra space
- no doxygen comment
- name commad might open an implicit group
this hould also be implicit cosed but does not happen somtimes
- crazy: internal declared groups have to be closed internal
According to ieee802154_radio_confirm_transmit docs, the parameter of
confirm_op for IEEE802154_HAL_OP_TRANSMIT is to be populated as an out
parameter -- but this implementation unconditionally left info
unpopulated. Thus, when run with LLVM, _fsm_state_tx_process_tx_done
looked into an uninitialized info and thus crashed into failing
assertions.
Closes: https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/issues/17591
- Adds capabilities for each PHY mode. Converts the uint16_t caps field to an
uint32_t in order to hold all capability bits, size of the structure remains
unchanged due to alignment.
- Modifies the test application to configure the PHY mode using the shell
command. Also adds the PHY modes to the capabilities shell command.
- Updates the nrf802154 and cc2538 radio drivers to specify the PHY mode
supported.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pierre Dudey <me@jeandudey.tech>
