19825: drivers: rename st7735 to more generic st77xx r=aabadie a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
This PR provides the following changes:
- renames the driver `st7735` to `st77xx`
- renames the test `st7735` to `st77xx`
- models controller variants as pseudomodules `st7735`, `st7789` and `st7796`
- removes the buggy initialization as a workaround to use reset defaults, see issue #19818
- adds backward compatibility header files for `ST7735_PARAM_*` symbols
- adds a test board for compilation test of backward compatibility
- updates the corresponding board definitions
The PR should solve the remaining dependency issues in KConfig we had by using `st7735` module for different controller variants. The backward compatibility header files should work for boards that still use `ST7735_PARAM_*` in their board definitions so that the board defintions at user's side use shouldn't be affected.
~To be compilable, the PR includes PR #19824.~
### Testing procedure
- Green CI
- `tests/drivers/disp_dev` and `tests/drivers/st77xx` should still work for all boards using a ST77xx display.
- The PR was already tested for these tests for:
- [x] `adafruit-pybadge`
- [x] `esp32s2-lilygo-ttgo-t8`
- [x] `esp32s3-usb-otg`
- [x] `sipeed-longan-nano`
### Issues/PRs references
Workaround for issue #19818
Preqruisite for PR #19827
Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
18620: core: add core_mutex_debug to aid debugging deadlocks r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
Adding `USEMODULE += core_mutex_debug` to your `Makefile` results in
on log messages such as
[mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x800024d)
being added whenever `mutex_lock()` blocks. This makes tracing down
deadlocks easier.
### Testing procedure
Run e.g.
```sh
USEMODULE=core_mutex_debug BOARD=nucleo-f767zi make -C tests/mutex_cancel flash test
```
which should provide output such as
```
Welcome to pyterm!
Type '/exit' to exit.
READY
s
[mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x8000f35)
START
main(): This is RIOT! (Version: 2022.10-devel-841-g5cc02-core/mutex/debug)
Test Application for mutex_cancel / mutex_lock_cancelable
=========================================================
Test without cancellation: OK
Test early cancellation: OK
Verify no side effects on subsequent calls: [mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x800024d)
OK
Test late cancellation: [mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x0)
OK
TEST PASSED
```
```sh
$ arm-none-eabi-addr2line -a 0x800024d -e tests/mutex_cancel/bin/nucleo-f767zi/tests_mutex_cancel.elf
0x0800024d
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/tests/mutex_cancel/main.c:51
```
### Issues/PRs references
Depends on and includes https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/18619
19296: nanocoap: allow to define CoAP resources as XFA r=maribu a=benpicco
19504: cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx: Fix bogus array-bound warning r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
GCC 12 create a bogus array out of bounds warning as it assumes that because there is special handling for `uart == 0` and `uart == 1`, `uart` can indeed be `1`. There is an `assert(uart < UART_NUMOF)` above that would blow up prior to any out of bounds access.
In any case, optimizing out the special handling of `uart == 1` for when `UART_NUMOF == 1` likely improves the generated code and fixes the warning.
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:88:8: error: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of 'uart_isr_ctx_t[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
88 | ctx[uart].rx_cb = rx_cb;
| ~~~^~~~~~
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:52:23: note: while referencing 'ctx'
52 | static uart_isr_ctx_t ctx[UART_NUMOF];
| ^~~
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:89:8: error: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of 'uart_isr_ctx_t[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
89 | ctx[uart].arg = arg;
| ~~~^~~~~~
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:52:23: note: while referencing 'ctx'
52 | static uart_isr_ctx_t ctx[UART_NUMOF];
| ^~~
### Testing procedure
The actual change is a pretty obvious one-liner, so that code review and a green CI should be sufficient. If not, running any UART example app without regression should do.
### Issues/PRs references
None
19506: tools/openocd: Fix handling of OPENOCD_CMD_RESET_HALT r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
The OPENOCD_CMD_RESET_HALT was not longer correctly passed to the script. This fixes the issue.
### Testing procedure
Flashing of e.g. the `cc2650-launchpad` with upstream OpenOCD should work again.
### Issues/PRs references
The change was added to https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/19050 after testing the PR and before merging. I'm not sure if the fix never worked because of this, or if behavior of `target-export-variables` or GNU Make changed.
Co-authored-by: Marian Buschsieweke <marian.buschsieweke@ovgu.de>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@bht-berlin.de>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
Since `auto_init_usb` provides a static auto configuration for a single USBUS stack instance using a single USB device, a static assert can be used here to check whether the number of EPs required by the configuration does not exceed the number of EPs provided by the USB device.
18477: gnrc_static: add static network configuration r=miri64 a=benpicco
19101: CI: update check-labels-action r=miri64 a=kaspar030
19155: Revert "sys/pm_layered: pm_(un)block add attribute optimize(3)" r=maribu a=Teufelchen1
Revert "sys/pm_layered: pm_(un)block add attribute optimize(3) -shortens hotpath"
This reverts commit 5447203921.
### Contribution description
Compiling `examples/gnrc_networking_mac` using `TOOLCHAIN=llvm` yields the following error:
```
RIOT/sys/pm_layered/pm.c:77:16: error: unknown attribute 'optimize' ignored [-Werror,-Wunknown-attributes]
__attribute__((optimize(3)))
```
As indicated, this is because the attribute `optimize` is GCC only and not present in LLVM.
Compare the manpages of [GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html) and [LLVM](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html).
### Testing procedure
Since this should only affect performance and not behavior, no special testing is needed. I am not aware of any tests in RIOT which could verify that assumption.
### Issues/PRs references
Introduced in #18846
There is another instance of this attribute being used in[ shell_lock.c](6fb340d654/sys/shell_lock/shell_lock.c (L80)). Since the usage is security related, I omit it from this PR.
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
Co-authored-by: Kaspar Schleiser <kaspar@schleiser.de>
Co-authored-by: Teufelchen1 <bennet.blischke@haw-hamburg.de>
