Add a message bus where threads can listen for nib events.
Currently only the GNRC_IPV6_NIB_EVENT_ADDR_VALID event is
implemented which informs subscribers that an address got
valid.
With multiple 6LoWPAN interfaces the router for the given interface
—the one the triggering RA came over—should be used to register the
address with.
Co-Authored-By: Benjamin Valentin <benpicco@googlemail.com>
In 06aa65e1ba (#10627) a new behavior was
introduced in IPv6 route resolution to try address resolution only at
interfaces that have the prefix of the address to be resolved configured
in the prefix list. This however only makes sense, if the prefix
configured is [on-link], otherwise there is small likelihood of the
address to be resolved being on that link.
For the error case presented for 06aa65e (circular routing at the border
router) this made sense, however within a 6LoWPAN, due to the prefix
being valid for the entire mesh, this leads to the nodes always trying
classic address resolution for in-network addresses instead of just
routing to the default route.
Classic address resolution however fails, as 6LoWPAN hosts typically
[don't join the solicited-node multicast address of their unicast
addresses][6LN-iface-init], resulting in in-network addresses not being
reachable.
As such, to prevent both error cases
- the fallback to address resolution by prefix list must only be used
when the prefix is on-link,
- the prefix configured by DHCPv6/UHCP at the 6LoWPAN border router
must be configured as on-link, but
- the prefix must not be advertised as on-link within the 6LoWPAN to
still be [in line with RFC 6775][RFC-6775-forbidden]
With this change these cases are covered.
[on-link]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#page-6
[RFC 6775]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6775
[6LN-iface-init]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6775#section-5.2
[RFC-6775-forbidden]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6775#section-6.1
When pinging to a prefix for which there is a prefix list entry on the
node (so no next hop) but a default route, a packet to a non-existent
address under that prefix results in the packet being forwarded to the
default route instead. This fixes it, so the node tries address
resolution on the interface the prefix list entry is associated to.
The reassembly buffer only needs (and stores) the headers *before* the
fragment header (called per-fragment headers in RFC 8200, section 4.5).
Currently, when a subsequent IPv6 fragment is received before the first
fragment the fragment header is however not removed. With this fix it
does.
Having the definitions sit in the `net/gnrc/sixlowpan/frag.h` header
does not make much sense, when using Selective Fragment Forwarding
(and the fragmentation buffer already includes a
`net/gnrc/sixlowpan/frag/stats.h` header), so they are moved to their
own header. Since with this change it makes more sense to have the
statistics stored in their own sub-module, the pseudo-module is also
actualized.
When the destination address is the loopback address (`::1`) in GNRC
the selected network interface typically is `NULL`, as with GNRC no
loopback interface de facto exists. So the assertion when checking if
the source address is valid if `netif != NULL` fails on that check.
This change fixes that issue by checking if the destination address is
the loopback address, before checking the validity of the source
address.
This fits with the semantics of this function which doesn't provide or
uses any state of the reassembly buffer provided by the user, but finds
the entry itself and then removes it. This gives the user no chance to
remove the packet in the reassembly buffer entry, so
`gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_rb_rm_by_datagram()` has to release the packet
(other than `gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_rb_remove()` where not releasing the
packet is desired as it might be handed up to an upper layer).
This allows to set a timer between the completion of a datagram in the
reassembly buffer and the deletion of the corresponding reassembly
buffer entry. This allows to ignore potentially late incoming link-layer
duplicates of fragments of the datagram that then will have the
reassembly buffer entry be blocked.
This was noted in this [discussion] for classic 6LoWPAN reassembly (and
minimal fragment forwarding) and is recommended in the current
[selective fragment recovery draft][SFR draft].
[discussion]: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6lo/Ez0tzZDqawVn6AFhYzAFWUOtJns
[SFR draft]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-07#section-6
The name `fragment_msg` or `frag_msg`/`msg_frag` always to me was a bit
misplaced, as it basically implements an asynchronous fragmentation
buffer and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with messages.
This change
1. changes the name to `fb` (for fragmentation buffer)
2. factors its code out to its own sub-module so it can be re-used by
other 6LoWPAN fragmentation schemes like [Selective Fragment
Recovery]
[Selective Fragment Recovery]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-fragment-recovery-05
The interface is already fetched in the beginning of the function and
doesn't change during its run, so getting the interface again at this
point is just redundant.
