18620: core: add core_mutex_debug to aid debugging deadlocks r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
Adding `USEMODULE += core_mutex_debug` to your `Makefile` results in
on log messages such as
[mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x800024d)
being added whenever `mutex_lock()` blocks. This makes tracing down
deadlocks easier.
### Testing procedure
Run e.g.
```sh
USEMODULE=core_mutex_debug BOARD=nucleo-f767zi make -C tests/mutex_cancel flash test
```
which should provide output such as
```
Welcome to pyterm!
Type '/exit' to exit.
READY
s
[mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x8000f35)
START
main(): This is RIOT! (Version: 2022.10-devel-841-g5cc02-core/mutex/debug)
Test Application for mutex_cancel / mutex_lock_cancelable
=========================================================
Test without cancellation: OK
Test early cancellation: OK
Verify no side effects on subsequent calls: [mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x800024d)
OK
Test late cancellation: [mutex] waiting for thread 1 (pc = 0x0)
OK
TEST PASSED
```
```sh
$ arm-none-eabi-addr2line -a 0x800024d -e tests/mutex_cancel/bin/nucleo-f767zi/tests_mutex_cancel.elf
0x0800024d
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/tests/mutex_cancel/main.c:51
```
### Issues/PRs references
Depends on and includes https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/18619
19296: nanocoap: allow to define CoAP resources as XFA r=maribu a=benpicco
19504: cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx: Fix bogus array-bound warning r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
GCC 12 create a bogus array out of bounds warning as it assumes that because there is special handling for `uart == 0` and `uart == 1`, `uart` can indeed be `1`. There is an `assert(uart < UART_NUMOF)` above that would blow up prior to any out of bounds access.
In any case, optimizing out the special handling of `uart == 1` for when `UART_NUMOF == 1` likely improves the generated code and fixes the warning.
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:88:8: error: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of 'uart_isr_ctx_t[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
88 | ctx[uart].rx_cb = rx_cb;
| ~~~^~~~~~
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:52:23: note: while referencing 'ctx'
52 | static uart_isr_ctx_t ctx[UART_NUMOF];
| ^~~
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:89:8: error: array subscript 1 is above array bounds of 'uart_isr_ctx_t[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
89 | ctx[uart].arg = arg;
| ~~~^~~~~~
/home/maribu/Repos/software/RIOT/cc2650/cpu/cc26xx_cc13xx/periph/uart.c:52:23: note: while referencing 'ctx'
52 | static uart_isr_ctx_t ctx[UART_NUMOF];
| ^~~
### Testing procedure
The actual change is a pretty obvious one-liner, so that code review and a green CI should be sufficient. If not, running any UART example app without regression should do.
### Issues/PRs references
None
19506: tools/openocd: Fix handling of OPENOCD_CMD_RESET_HALT r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
The OPENOCD_CMD_RESET_HALT was not longer correctly passed to the script. This fixes the issue.
### Testing procedure
Flashing of e.g. the `cc2650-launchpad` with upstream OpenOCD should work again.
### Issues/PRs references
The change was added to https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/19050 after testing the PR and before merging. I'm not sure if the fix never worked because of this, or if behavior of `target-export-variables` or GNU Make changed.
Co-authored-by: Marian Buschsieweke <marian.buschsieweke@ovgu.de>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@bht-berlin.de>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
19365: bootloaders: fix bootloader button logic r=benpicco a=dylad
### Contribution description
In lastest master, the `BTN_BOOTLOADER_INVERTED` logic doesn't work as expected.
This PR fixes the underlying logic by replacing the `BTN_BOOTLOADER_INVERTED` macro definition by a runtime function.
In fact the current code:
```
#ifndef BTN_BOOTLOADER_INVERTED
#if (BTN0_MODE == GPIO_IN_PD)
#define BTN_BOOTLOADER_INVERTED false
#else
#define BTN_BOOTLOADER_INVERTED true
#endif
#endif
```
cannot work because both `BTN0_MODE` and `GPIO_IN_PD` are not known by the precompiler as they are enum values defined at cpu level.
Thus, replaces it by a runtime function in our bootloader applications.
I've also add `GPIO_OD_PU` along side `GPIO_IN_PU` and add a new define (which can be override at board level or app level) in case an external pullup is used.
### Testing procedure
Flash the riotboot_dfu bootloader:
`make BOARD=saml21-xpro -C bootloaders/riotboot_dfu flash`
Then, flash any test app:
`PROGRAMMER=dfu-util USEMODULE=usbus_dfu make BOARD=saml21-xpro -C tests/shell riotboot/flash-slot0`
With master, the application will not start.
With this PR, the application will start after flashing.
### Issues/PRs references
Fixes#19364
19366: nanocoap_sock: don't include token in empty ACK response r=benpicco a=benpicco
19367: cord: bump reference from draft to rfc r=benpicco a=bergzand
### Contribution description
The draft is an RFC, this bumps the "see also" in the docs to the rfc.
### Testing procedure
Check that the correct RFC is linked in the docs.
### Issues/PRs references
None
Co-authored-by: Dylan Laduranty <dylan.laduranty@mesotic.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
Co-authored-by: Koen Zandberg <koen@bergzand.net>
18773: nanocoap_sock: fix handling empty ACKs with separate response r=maribu a=benpicco
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@bht-berlin.de>
If a NON confirmable message is sent with a callback function,
not receiving a response in time would lead to a retransmission.
This is of course an error, as only CON messages are to be retransmitted.
The assertion is a bit overeager.
In case of receiving a wrong message ID, we re-try receive without
entering the STATE_REQUEST_SEND state again, so it is expected that
we get a non-NULL ctx/response from sock_udp_recv_buf().
What this assert should actually check is that we don't get a non-NULL
ctx after calling sock_udp_recv_buf() with a non-NULL ctx.
So make this explicit to not falsely fail the assertion.
