Currently, `gnrc_pktdump` only prints the header part of a snip.
However, if the snip wasn't parsed yet by the corresponding GNRC
module (or the module doesn't exist because the node is e.g. just a
forwarder), additional data might not be printed.
This makes it hard to analyze the data properly (sometimes you not only
want to know where the IPv6 packet is supposed to go, you also want to
know what's in it). So this just prints the rest of the snip as a hex
dump.
Provides functions for type 3, 4 and 5 UUID generations.
UUID type 1 is timestamp based and requires an accurate time source. For
this reason it is left out of this implementation. UUID type 2 is not
defined in RFC 4122 and thus also not included here
Reordered struct members to not waste memory due to padding.
Before:
``` C
typedef struct {
uint8_t src_l2addr_len;
uint8_t dst_l2addr_len;
kernel_pid_t if_pid; // <-- 16 bit, is aligned to 16 bit
uint8_t flags;
uint8_t __padding_byte; // <-- Inserted to fulfill padding requirements
int16_t rssi; // <-- 16 bit, is NOT aligned to 16 bit
uint8_t lqi;
uint8_t __padding_byte2;// <-- Inserted to fulfill padding requirements
} gnrc_netif_hdr_t;
```
Now:
``` C
typedef struct {
uint8_t src_l2addr_len;
uint8_t dst_l2addr_len;
kernel_pid_t if_pid; // <-- 16 bit, is aligned to 16 bit
uint8_t flags;
uint8_t lqi;
int16_t rssi; // <-- 16 bit, is aligned to 16 bit
} gnrc_netif_hdr_t;
```
When build for the `bluepill` board, the new layout reduces the size by 2 bytes.
Function is broken with num_bytes >= 4.
Could happen when storing input_len with len_encoding >= 4.
It can take values from 2 to 8, so make it work for cases it would overflow.
Maximum input_len depends only on length_encoding and not auth_data_len.
The current length_max value was also wrong.
RFC3610 page 2
3. The message m, consisting of a string of l(m) octets where 0 <=
l(m) < 2^(8L). The length restriction ensures that l(m) can be
encoded in a field of L octets.
The "new" forwarding table does not update an old route but just adds
another as long as it is not *exactly* the same. However, the RPL
adaptation missed to remove the old route so RPL got easily confused
about where it actually needed to send packets.
