Router Advertisements are enabled automatically for routing nodes
as soon as they obtain a prefix (e.g. via DHCPv6, UHCP, …).
Enabling router advertisements without a prefix to advertise is
wrong and causes no router solicitations to be send on an upstream
interface.
Also from https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4861#section-6.2.1
Note that AdvSendAdvertisements MUST be FALSE by
default so that a node will not accidentally start
acting as a router unless it is explicitly
configured by system management to send Router
Advertisements.
19539: drivers/periph_sdmmc: define a High-level SDIO/SD/MMC API and low-level SDMMC periperal driver interface r=benpicco a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
This PR provides a SDIO/SD/MMC Device API (SDMMC). It implements a SD host controller driver that provides a high-level functions using a low-level SDIO/SD/MMC peripheral driver for accessing
- MultiMediaCards (MMC) and Embedded MultiMediaCards (eMMC)
- SD Memory Cards (SD Cards) with Standard Capacity (SDSC), High Capacity (SDHC) or Extended Capacity (SDXC).
It supports:
- 1-bit, 4-bit and 8-bit data bus width
- Default Speed and High Speed
- Auto-CLK
The SDIO/SD/MMC device API (SDMMC) is divided into two parts:
1. The high-level API that implements the SD Host Controller driver and allows
- to inititialize and identify different types of cards,
- to access them either blockwise or bytewise,
- to get information about the used card, and
- to send single commands or application specific commands to the card.
2. The low-level SDIO/SD/MMC peripheral driver implements the low-level functions required by the high-level device API. It has to be implemented for each MCU.
### Limitations:
- Only one card per SDIO/SD/MMC device is supported.
- eMMCs specific features are not supported.
- UHS-I, UHS-II and UHS-III are not supported.
### Testing procedure
PR #19540, PR #19760 or PR #19786 is needed to test this PR.
### Issues/PRs references
Prerequisite for PR #19540
Prerequisite for PR #19760
Prerequisite for PR #19786
19815: cpu/sam0_common/periph/sdhc: busy waiting and clock fixes r=benpicco a=benpicco
19860: drivers/ft5x06: fix vendor ID for FT6xx6 and FTxxxx register addresses r=benpicco a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
This PR provides a fix of the vendor ID for FT6xx6 touch panel driver ICs and a fix of register addresses for FTxxxx.
According to the [Application Note for FT6x06 CTPM](https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/FT6x06_AN_public_ver0.1.3.pdf), the vendor ID of FT6x06 touch panel driver ICs is `0x11` instead of `0xcd`. Although there are no information found in the Web about the FT6x36, the FT6336U touch panel of a ESP32-S3 WT32 SC01 Plus is also working with `0x11` as vendor ID so that it seems that FT6x36 is also using `0x11` as vendor ID.
Figured out with a `stm32f723e-disco` board (revision D03). Without this PR, `tests/drivers/ft5x06` gives:
```
+------------Initializing------------+
[ft5x06] init: invalid vendor ID: '0x11' (expected: 0xcd)
[Error] Initialization failed
```
With this PR it works as expected.
```
+------------Initializing------------+
Initialization successful
main(): This is RIOT! (Version: 2023.10-devel-96-gbb9011-drivers/ft5x06_fix_vendor_id)
FT5x06 test application
+------------Initializing------------+
[ft5x06] init: configuring touchscreen interrupt
Initialization successful
1 touch detected
[ft5x06] read gesture_id '0x00'
Touch 1 - X: 151, Y:138
[ft5x06] read gesture_id '0x00'
```
Some background information found in the Web:
- According to the [STM32CubeF7](c20e6dd15b/Drivers/BSP/STM32F723E-Discovery/stm32f723e_discovery_ts.c (L24-L27)) the FRIDA LCD panel mounted on the `stm32f723e-disco` board either uses FT6x36 (prior revision D) or FT3x67 (revision D). However, the FT5x06 driver type for the card is defined as FT6x06, which does not seem correct: bb9011c3fb/boards/stm32f723e-disco/include/board.h (L59)
- According to the [STM32CubeF7](c20e6dd15b/Drivers/BSP/Components/ft6x06/ft6x06.h (L269-L270)), the vendor ID for FT6x36 should be `0xcd`. However, the FT6336U on ESP32-S3 WT32 SC01 Plus works with vendor ID `0x11`.
- The [Adafruit FT6206 library](95118cd983/Adafruit_FT6206.h (L28)) uses `0x11` as vendor id.
- The `stm32l496g-disco` board uses a FT6236 which has vendor ID `0xcd`.
So the information available on the web is confusing. Maybe, a better solution would be to accept `0x11` as well as `0xcd` as vendor ID for FT6xxx touch panels. Unfortunately, there are no documents available on the registers directly from FocalTech 😟 so it seems to be more speculation than knowledge.
### Testing procedure
### Issues/PRs references
19886: cpu/efm32: fix DAC configuration r=benpicco a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
The EFM32 MCU allows the reference voltage to be configured per DAC device, not per DAC channel. Also, the DAC reference voltage was defined in the configuration but not used anywhere.
At the moment we have only defined one board (`stwstk6220a`) that uses the DAC, so changing the configuration interface shouldn't be critical.
### Testing procedure
`tests/periph/dac` should still work for the `stwstk6220a`
```
BOARD=slwstk6220a make -j8 -C tests/periph/dac flash
```
I don't have a `stwstk6220a` board (EFM32 Series 0) so that I can't test it. I could only test it for the `sltb009a` board (EFM32 Series 1) with the change for VDAC in PR #19887.
### Issues/PRs references
Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
19876: sys/net/ipv4/addr: fix typos r=benpicco a=Enoch247
### Contribution description
This patch fixes some typos in the doxygen doc.
### Testing procedure
Nothing to test. No change to code.
### Issues/PRs references
- None known
19878: makefiles/usb_board_reset.mk: declare term-delay target with test target r=benpicco a=aabadie
19888: boards/sltb009a: complete and fix documentation r=benpicco a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
This PR completes and fixes the documentation which was still in the state as generated automatically by `efm2riot`.
The PR also includes a fix of the configuration of the second UART device that was find out while completing the documentation.
### Testing procedure
Green CI
### Issues/PRs references
Co-authored-by: Joshua DeWeese <jdeweese@primecontrols.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Abadie <alexandre.abadie@inria.fr>
Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
19487: nanocoap: implement extended tokens (RFC 8974) r=benpicco a=benpicco
19808: boards: add ESP32-S3-USB-OTG support r=benpicco a=gschorcht
### Contribution description
This PR provides the support for the [ESP32-S3-USB-OTG](https://docs.espressif.com/projects/espressif-esp-dev-kits/en/latest/esp32s3/esp32-s3-usb-otg/user_guide.html) board.
The SD card can only be used in SPI mode at the moment. As soon as PR #19786 is merged, the SD/MMC support can be enabled and the SD card can then be used in SD mode with 4-bit data bus width.
The display uses uses the ST7789 driver IC that is compatible with the ST7735. For that purpose the ST7735 driver is extended by a pseudomodule definition `st7789` for the ST7789 which is enabled by the board and enables automatically the `st7789` (e57c48a33ee2a869c15603788e5306ba066f91cf). Vise versa, board's `Makefile.dep` enables automatically the `st7789` pseudomodule if the `st7735` is used. The pseudomodule `st7789` is just used to increase the upper limit for supported lines. This change is also part of PR #19807.
~The PR includes a very small documentation fix for ESP32-S3-DevKit board that was noticed during the development of this board definition (1155b6ac1b8efa39d8a0bd7150e602095159fdc1).~
### Testing procedure
The board has been tested with all basic tests for supported hardware including `tests/driver/st3375`:
- [x] tests/drivers/st3375
- [x] tests/periph/gpio
- [x] tests/periph/pwm
- [x] tests/periph/spi
- [x] tests/periph/uart
- [x] tests/sys/usbus_cdc_ecm
### Issues/PRs references
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benpicco@beuth-hochschule.de>
Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
RIOT supports two distinct families of the MSP430: The [MSP430 x1xx]
MCU family and the [MSP430 F2xx/G2xx] MCU family. For both incompatible
MCU families the code was located in the msp430fxyz folder, resulting
in case of the UART driver in particularly bizarre code looking roughly
like this:
#ifndef UART_USE_USCI
/* implementation of x1xx peripheral ... */
#else
/* implementation of F2xx/G2xx peripheral ... */
#endif
/* zero shared code between both variants */
This splits the peripheral drivers for USCI and USART serial IP blocks
into separate files and relocates everything in cpu/msp430, similar to
how cpu/stm32 is organized.
[MSP430 x1xx]: https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slau049f/slau049f.pdf
[MSP430 F2xx/G2xx]: https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slau144k/slau144k.pdf
19686: sys/string_utils: add memchk() r=maribu a=benpicco
19687: tests/unittests: remove old workaround for SAML1X and gcc9.X bug r=maribu a=dylad
### Contribution description
This reverts #13462, this workaround is no longer needed with newer GCC version.
### Testing procedure
Try to compile tests/unittests for `saml11-xpro` or `saml10-xpro`
### Issues/PRs references
This is a revert of #13462.
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
Co-authored-by: Dylan Laduranty <dylan.laduranty@mesotic.com>
19610: drivers/periph/rtc: improve doc on rtc_set_alarm r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
- point out behavior on denormalized time stamps
- use errno codes to indicate errors (and adapt the few instances of actual error handling to use them)
19670: cpu/stm32: stm32f4 BRR from BSRR r=maribu a=kfessel
### Contribution description
sometimes one wants to save one instruction :)
just write the bits we need to write.
### Testing procedure
tests/periph/gpio_ll tests this
### Issues/PRs references
`@maribu` might know some reference
maybe #19407
19678: gnrc_sixlowpan_iphc: fix NULL pointer dereference r=maribu a=miri64
19679: gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_sfr: fix ARQ scheduler race-condition r=maribu a=miri64
19680: gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_rb: fix OOB write in _rbuf_add r=maribu a=miri64
19681: sys/xtimer: improve documentation r=maribu a=maribu
### Contribution description
- Add a warning that xtimer is deprecated, so that new code hopefully starts using ztimer
- Add a hint that `ztimer_xtimer_compat` can be used even after `xtimer` is gone
Co-authored-by: Marian Buschsieweke <marian.buschsieweke@ovgu.de>
Co-authored-by: Karl Fessel <karl.fessel@ovgu.de>
Co-authored-by: Martine Lenders <m.lenders@fu-berlin.de>
- Add a deprecation note to xtimer, so that new code hopefully
starts using ztimer
- Add a hint that `ztimer_xtimer_compat` can be used even after `xtimer`
is gone
19268: shell_lock: don't set CONFIG_SHELL_SHUTDOWN_ON_EXIT r=benpicco a=benpicco
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benpicco@beuth-hochschule.de>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@ml-pa.com>
19601: SUIT: Prepared manifests r=chrysn a=chrysn
### Contribution description
While SUIT can generally be used already with manifests that are "dropped into memory" (by any mechanism), the convenient SUIT worker thread mechanism so far could not be used with it.
This adds the suit_worker_try_prepare / suit_worker_trigger_prepared
pair for using the SUIT worker, and breaks suit_handle_manifest_buf out
of suit_handle_url (where the latter now calls the former).
#### By-catch
As part of factoring out reaping of the zombie worker thread, a locking
error that deadlocks the SUIT worker in case the race between the mutex
being unlocked and the thread being reaped hits the necessary handling
code is fixed (and mutex_unlock is called in the error path).
### Testing procedure
SUIT tests should pass.
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/19659 provides a demo of how the new API is used.
### Issues/PRs references
I think that the currently employed mechanism of having a resource to which a URL with the manifest gets posted is contrary to the design goals of SUIT -- the signed manifest should be what justifies the device to spend resources (eg. get data from a server), not a URI that is just *not* signed.
This PR makes it easier to implement a resource to which the manifest can be POSTed, rather than a CoAP URI that represents the manifest, as is proposed (but not mature) in
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/19659.
[edit: Adjusted to reflect decisions made during review]
Co-authored-by: chrysn <chrysn@fsfe.org>
This adds the suit_worker_try_prepare / suit_worker_trigger_prepared
pair for using the SUIT worker, and breaks suit_handle_manifest_buf out
of suit_handle_url (where the latter now calls the former).
As part of factoring out reaping of the zombie worker thread, a locking
error that deadlocks the SUIT worker in case the race between the mutex
being unlocked and the thread being reaped hits the necessary handling
code is fixed (and mutex_unlock is called in the error path).
