This assertion doesn't make any sense. The function is called by
_copy_and_handle_aro() on a router which causes `nce` to be NULL
(because there is no NCE known yet) and then the function called
directly after (_reg_addr_upstream()) checks if `nce` might be NULL and
creates an NCE if necessary.
While the GNRC_IPV6_NIB_RTR_TIMEOUT is properly handled, it is actually
never fired. Moreover, the router lifetime is set, but never read.
This removes the router lifetime and switches it out for an evtimer
to does the GNRC_IPV6_NIB_RTR_TIMEOUT event.
When there are holes in the NIB (e.g. when entries were removed)
currently the NIB crashes the system due to a failed assertion
(`DEVELHELP` needs to be activated to test this behavior).
This fixes this behavior by making the assertion a check that is always
compiled in.
In the case that GNRC_IPV6_NIB_CONF_ARSM is set but
GNRC_IPV6_NIB_CONF_6LN is not, clang complains about
the function _get_l2addr_from_ipv6 never being used.
I couldn't easily figure out why this passes in Murdock,
but I'm guessing that clang is simply being smarter than
GCC. Can someone comment on whether there is a better fix
for this?
Relates to #6473
_is_reachable is only used when GNRC_IPV6_NIB_CONF_ARSM
is enabled, and as such it must be guarded so that clang
doesn't complain about a unused function in case
GNRC_IPV6_NIB_CONF_ARSM is not set
Similar to #7910
Relates to 6473
